Quenya 

-lmo

we (two)

-lmo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal ending for the 1st person dual inclusive (later revised by Tolkien to -ngwë). This -lmo was listed as an alternative to -ngo (VT49:48).

-lmo

suffix. we (inclusive dual)

-lma

suffix. our (inclusive)

Variations

  • -lma ✧ PE17/013; PE17/013; PE17/057; PE17/132; PE17/135; PE17/190
Quenya [PE17/013; PE17/057; PE17/132; PE17/135; PE17/190] Group: Eldamo. Published by

-mmo

we (two)

[-mmo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal suffix for the 1st person dual exclusive, which ending Tolkien later revised to -mmë (VT49:48).]

-lva

suffix. our (inclusive)

Derivations

  • -lwa ✧ PE17/130

Phonetic Developments

DevelopmentStagesSources
-lwa > -lva[-lwa] > [-lva]✧ PE17/130

Variations

  • -lwa ✧ VT49/16
Quenya [PE17/130; VT49/16] Group: Eldamo. Published by

-lwa

suffix. our (inclusive)

-ngo

we (two)

-ngo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal ending for the 1st person dual inclusive (later revised by Tolkien to -ngwë/-nquë). An alternative form -lmo was also listed (VT49:48). The ending -ngo was probably meant to represent older *-ngwo (VT49:49).

-ngo

suffix. we (inclusive dual)

Variations

  • -lmo ✧ PE17/075; VT49/48
Quenya [PE17/075; VT49/48] Group: Eldamo. Published by

-ngë

suffix. we (inclusive dual)

-ngwë

suffix. we (inclusive dual)

@@@ < -ñge < -ññe < -sñe

Derivations

  • -sñe “dual 1st person b (exclusive)” ✧ PE19/069

Element in

Variations

  • -ñgwe ✧ PE17/057
  • -ngwe ✧ PE17/075; VT49/16; VT49/48
  • ngwe ✧ PE17/136 (ngwe)
  • nge ✧ PE19/069
Quenya [PE17/057; PE17/075; PE17/136; PE19/069; VT21/06; VT49/16; VT49/48] Group: Eldamo. Published by

Sindarin 

gwîn

pronoun. our (inclusive)

Elements

WordGloss
gwe“we (inclusive)”
Sindarin Group: Eldamo - neologism/reconstructions. Published by

pîn

pronoun. our (inclusive)

Elements

WordGloss
pe“we (inclusive)”
Sindarin Group: Eldamo - neologism/reconstructions. Published by