[-mmo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal suffix for the 1st person dual exclusive, which ending Tolkien later revised to -mmë (VT49:48).]
Quenya
-lmo
we (two)
-lmo
suffix. we (inclusive dual)
-lma
suffix. our (inclusive)
Variations
- -lma ✧ PE17/013; PE17/013; PE17/057; PE17/132; PE17/135; PE17/190
-mmo
we (two)
-lva
suffix. our (inclusive)
Derivations
- ✶-lwa ✧ PE17/130
Phonetic Developments
Development Stages Sources ✶-lwa > -lva [-lwa] > [-lva] ✧ PE17/130 Variations
- -lwa ✧ VT49/16
-lwa
suffix. our (inclusive)
-ngo
we (two)
-ngo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal ending for the 1st person dual inclusive (later revised by Tolkien to -ngwë/-nquë). An alternative form -lmo was also listed (VT49:48). The ending -ngo was probably meant to represent older *-ngwo (VT49:49).
-ngo
suffix. we (inclusive dual)
Variations
- -lmo ✧ PE17/075; VT49/48
-ngë
suffix. we (inclusive dual)
-ngwë
suffix. we (inclusive dual)
@@@ < -ñge < -ññe < -sñe
Derivations
- ✶-sñe “dual 1st person b (exclusive)” ✧ PE19/069
Element in
- Q. sí man i yulmar n(g)wen enquantuva “*who now will refill the cups for us (dual)” ✧ VT21/06
Variations
- -ñgwe ✧ PE17/057
- -ngwe ✧ PE17/075; VT49/16; VT49/48
- ngwe ✧ PE17/136 (ngwe)
- nge ✧ PE19/069
-lmo "we (two)", abandoned pronominal ending for the 1st person dual inclusive (later revised by Tolkien to -ngwë). This -lmo was listed as an alternative to -ngo (VT49:48).