Fifth phrase @@@
| |  I  | II |III|IV|  V  |VII| |ar|ar ke|ar ké mo| |formenna| |{tente >>}|tentane| |tentane|>> tentanes| |Amanna|
cé
may be
cé
adverb. may (be)
cé
conjunction. if
ar cé mo formenna tentanes amanna
and if northwards, it pointed towards Aman
Fifth phrase @@@
| |  I  | II |III|IV|  V  |VII| |ar|ar ke|ar ké mo| |formenna| |{tente >>}|tentane| |tentane|>> tentanes| |Amanna|
cé mo quetë ulca
*if one speaks evil
cé tulis, ní nauva tanomë
*if he/she comes, I will be there
cé tulis, tanomë nauvan
*if he/she comes, I will be there
lá caritas alasaila cé nauva
not doing this may be/prove unwise
úsië, an cé mo quernë cendelë númenna, ve senya
on the contrary, for if one turned the face westward, as was usual
Third phrase @@@
| |  I  | II |III|IV|  V  |VI|VII| |{lasi >> la >>}|lasir|>>|ūsir|úsir| |úsir|>> úsie| |{pan >> an >>}|an ké mo| |{nanquerne >> númequerna >>}|querne|{quernesse >>} quernes|querne|quere|querne| |immo|kanwarya|kendele| |númenna|(ve senya)|númenna| |(ve ...)| |(ve senwa)|(ve senya)|{i hyarma} númenna|ve senya|
cé ("k"), also ce ("k") "may be" (VT49:19, 27), particle indicating uncertainty (VT42:34; ce in Bill Welden's note is a misspelling, VT44:38, but the short form ce does occur in other texts, cf. VT49:18-19). In VT42, Welden wrote that Tolkien altered ké to kwí (or kwíta, q.v.), but Welden later noted that "it does not follow that because the form was changed in another sentence it would necessarily have been corrected in the examples cited" (VT44:38). So cé/ké may still be a conceptually valid form. (The forms in kw- rather than qu- seem abnormal for Quenya, at least as far as spelling is concerned.) In another conceptual phase, cé was also used = "if" (VT49:19), but this conjunction appears as qui elsewhere. Examples of cé, ce meaning "if" (said to be "usually [used] with aorist") include cé mo quetë ulca ("k", "q") "if one speaks evil", cé tulis, nauvan tanomë ("k") "if (s)he comes, I will be there" (VT49:19), cé mo… "if one…", ce formenna "if northwards" (VT49:26)